honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Posted on: Sunday, December 14, 2003

Silicon Valley revival built on cheap labor in India

 •  Chart: Tech startups cut costs by hiring abroad

By Rachel Konrad
Associated Press

Rosen Sharma, CEO of Solidcore Systems, a year-old software startup in Silicon Valley, has been moving his company's jobs offshore: "Our raw material is intellectual power, which is cheap in India, and the finished product, our software, can be sold around the world."

Associated Press

PALO ALTO, Calif. — Solidcore Systems appears the quintessential Silicon Valley startup, with laptop-lugging, cube-dwelling workers huddling in glass conference rooms and jotting sales strategies on white boards.

But within a year, most of the engineers who make the company's security software will be on the other side of the globe. Even the chief financial officer, chief technology officer and the head of research and development will work out of the emerging Indian tech hubs of Pune (formerly Poona) and New Delhi.

After launching five startups, Solidcore chief executive Rosen Sharma says he would never build a company without outsourcing the relatively expensive and highly skilled tech jobs to low-paid contractors or local hires in developing countries.

"The British empire bought raw cotton inexpensively in India and sold the finished goods back in England," said Sharma, 31, who earned a Ph.D. in computer science from Cornell University. "Our raw material is intellectual power, which is cheap in India, and the finished product, our software, can be sold around the world."

With the drastically lower labor costs, Sharma can stretch $5.3 million in venture funding until the company finds paying customers.

Fiscal frugality after the dot-com bust forced hundreds of cash-strapped startups to slash costs by any means possible in early 2000. Three years later, Silicon Valley investors are pressuring entrepreneurs to shrink personnel costs by as much as 60 percent by sending jobs overseas.

Within the past year, startups have taken the outsourcing trend to extreme lengths, migrating entire development teams to India, China and Russia and leaving only skeletal crews in Silicon Valley and tech hubs such as Boston and Seattle.

"You either embrace this or die," said Warren Weiss, general partner at Menlo Park-based Foundation Capital. Earlier this year, one-third of the engineers at one of Weiss' portfolio companies, Walnut Creek-based software firm manageStar, moved to Asia.

"There's no way you can have a Silicon Valley company without outsourcing," Weiss said. "You simply can't make the numbers work."

But the rapid escalation of outsourcing worries some economists and venture capitalists.

Although startups rarely employ more than a few hundred people — often working for smaller salaries than big companies pay — they act as crucial incubators and entrepreneurial farm teams for established companies.

Outsourcing startup work could have disastrous long-term consequences, critics say, depriving Americans of unique business experience and minimizing the likelihood that the next Hewlett-Packard will get its start in a Palo Alto garage.

"Human beings aren't good at recognizing risks to the ecosystem when they're acting in their own self-interest — that's the case with the environment, and it might be the case now with Silicon Valley," said Allen Morgan, managing director of Menlo Park-based venture firm Mayfield Fund.

Although few researchers have tracked outsourcing at thousands of startups around the country, the phenomenon has reshaped the broader technology sector. Gartner Inc. predicts at least one out of 10 technology jobs in the United States will move overseas by the end of 2004.

According to research firm IDC, foreign workers performed about 5 percent of information technology services for American companies this year, but by 2007, that share will grow to 23 percent.

Entrepreneurs say the trend is downright feverish at startups because venture capitalists relentlessly focus on "burn rates" — the amount of money a company can afford to spend and still survive each month.

Before dot-com investors turned stingy, a typical software startup might have received an initial funding round of up to $15 million, which was expected to last about a year.

Many entrepreneurs today receive $3 million or less, and rarely more than $10 million, to finance a similar operation. That means founders can burn as little as $250,000 per month.

Venture firms now sponsor how-to outsourcing clinics for companies in their portfolio, and more entrepreneurs are pitching business proposals that already include detailed offshore strategies. How "offshoreable" a project is can determine whether a venture firm will endorse a company with an initial funding round.

"If we're looking at two companies and one can come to market on $20 million, and another takes $40 million, that's the difference between something we'd like to do and one that's not financeable from our perspective," said Tom Dyal, general partner Menlo Park-based Redpoint Ventures. Dyal is on the board of a consumer electronics startup — he would not provide details because it's still in "stealth mode" — with plans to outsource its entire development team to Asia.

Not all startups are embracing outsourcing, and serial entrepreneurs say the practice can be risky.

Wireless startup Sonim Technologies outsourced almost all its engineering work to India but within three months brought it back to the United States and expanded its San Mateo headquarters.

Founders decided that the Indian hires were not as skilled — particularly with building telecommunications switches — as they expected, said Neeraj Bharadwaj of Apax Partners, which funded Sonim.

"You can't rush into this because outsourcing is a buzz word," Bharadwaj said.

• • •