honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Wednesday, April 7, 2004

Drug tests may expand for federal workers

By Leigh Strope
Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The hair, saliva and sweat of federal workers could be tested for drug use under a government policy proposed yesterday that could set screening standards for millions of private employers.

The proposal will expand the methods to detect drug use among 1.6 million federal workers beyond urine samples. It is being implemented with an eye toward the private sector, however, because it would signal the government's approval for such testing, which many companies are awaiting before adopting their own screening programs.

The rule is subject to a 90-day public comment period. A final plan could be issued by year's end.

About 400,000 federal workers — such as those who have security clearances, carry firearms, are involved in national security or are presidential appointees — must undergo testing. Others are tested only if they show signs of drug use or are involved in a work-related accident.

"What we think is going to happen with the introduction of alternative specimens is, it's going to make it much tougher for individuals to be able to adequately prepare and to avoid detection," said Robert Stephenson, director of the workplace programs division in the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

However, the number of federal workers that attempt to defraud urine tests is "virtually zero," Stephenson said.

"We expect other interested parties to use the same standards and benefit from the quality assurance procedures and certification of laboratories and products that we are in fact putting out there for federal employees," Stephenson said.

The testing industry was involved in creating the plan, but unions representing federal employees were not. The National Treasury Employees Union, with members in 29 agencies, has opposed sweat tests, claiming scientific studies have shown they are unreliable.

Stephenson's agency said the proposal is based on scientific evidence that hair, saliva and sweat specimens can be tested "with the same level of confidence that has been applied to the use of urine." Agencies will not be required to use the tests.

The Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Association, with about 1,200 members, has lobbied for the regulations since the mid-1990s, said Laura Shelton, executive director of the Alexandria, Va.-based group. The rules are expected to be a boon to the industry.

"It will greatly increase the use of them," Shelton said, speaking of the alternative tests. "A lot of employers have been sitting in the back saying, 'Well, these aren't approved for federal testing, so maybe something is not quite right' — even though there are studies out there showing they are effective."

Tests can cost $20 to $50, with hair testing being the most expensive, Shelton said. Saliva and sweat tests cost only slightly more than urine tests.