honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Posted on: Wednesday, September 8, 2004

Floridians face high deductibles

By David Royse
Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Thousands of Floridians soon will get a welcome sight: a check that will allow them to begin repairing damage done by hurricanes Charley or Frances.

Hurricane Frances toppled a mango tree onto this house in Fort Pierce, Fla. Many Florida residents whose houses sustained damage are facing deductibles of up to 5 percent of their home's value.

Associated Press photos


The golden arches of a McDonald's sign near Vero Beach, Fla., were left looking like a golden pretzel by Hurricane Frances.
But for many there also will be an unwelcome sight — the amount they're responsible for paying could be steep.

After Hurricane Andrew in 1992, insurers doing business in Florida were allowed to charge dramatically higher deductibles on hurricane damage claims. Where homeowners are used to paying $500 or $1,000 deductibles for other damage, like from a tornado, they now will pay 2 percent of the value of their home or more for their hurricane deductible.

For homes worth more than $100,000, homeowners would be responsible for at least $2,000 in repair costs. Other homeowners could see higher deductibles, up to 5 percent of a home's value.

The change was made in 1996, one of many concessions state lawmakers made to insurers in Andrew's wake to keep them selling hurricane coverage in Florida. But most residents making claims because of Charley or Frances are doing so for the first time since then. And a number will be stunned at how much they're responsible for paying.

"People don't realize they have a large deductible," said Tom Gallagher, Florida's chief financial officer. "I really think that's a surprise people aren't expecting."

Even for those who did know — because they read their policies — it's still not any easier.

Ilyse Kusnetz knew her policy included the higher deductible. But, like most people, she didn't expect to have to use it. When a 65-foot tree fell on her Orlando house during Charley, she became one of a thousands looking at a large repair bill, one that she'll be largely responsible for because of the high deductible.

She doesn't know how much yet — but it could approach the full $2,400 cost of removing the tree and repairing shingle damage to her roof.

"For somebody like me, that's an awful lot of money," said Kusnetz, a community college professor.

She also may face another difficulty that some Floridians will see — having to pay a double deductible because insurers require separate claims and deductibles for damage from separately named storms. If she has to make two large repair payments, it would be "a real hardship to meet it twice."

Gov. Jeb Bush said the double deductible is something that might need to be changed.

"That could be an issue that the Legislature looks at," he said yesterday.

But insurers say the higher deductibles keep rates lower than they otherwise would be. And they say the deductibles, coupled with premium increases since Andrew, have left them able to write hurricane coverage in Florida, where millions live in homes in areas prone to hurricane-force winds.

"The higher deductible can impose a hardship, but in return you get a substantial insurance discount for it," said Sam Miller, spokesman for the Florida Insurance Council, which represents insurers. "If you set that money aside over the years, you probably would have the money to pay the deductible."

"I don't think we have to justify it," Miller said. "Without it, rates would be considerably higher than they are."

Hurricane Andrew caused nearly $20 billion in damage in August 1992 and prompted an exodus of insurance companies willing to write policies.

Insurers point out that policies on homes worth less than $100,000 still have a straight dollar-value deductibles, but that's fewer than 1 million homes.

More than 15 other states have percentage deductibles on homeowners policies. For example, California does the same for earthquake policies.