Posted on: Monday, January 31, 2005

SECOND OPINION

By Cliff Slater

Once more legislators are calling for a Barber's Point to Downtown ferry. To demonstrate what little thought they have given to this, let's review the public record.

In 1987, I was chairman of the State Ridesharing Task Force, which had been formed to look at alternatives to the single-occupant auto. The Hawai'i Department of Transportation assigned two of their researchers to us, Dr. Kevin Flannelly and the late Malcolm McLeod, two of the brighter people I have met in this field. Among many commuter options, we discussed ferries.

They showed us how few people ride those ferries that parallel highways — almost no matter how bad the traffic. They subsequently produced three studies in the period 1988-91 to back up their research. Additionally, the Task Force produced its own report, which the state promptly buried; this was understandable since the report called for private-sector involvement.

Nevertheless, despite the research, the state subsidized a ferry throughout most of 1992. It failed because of insufficient riders. As I recall, the number of riders was almost exactly what Flannelly and McLeod had predicted. It was not long after this that both of them were fired from the DOT. As the old saying goes, "It is very dangerous to be right when the authorities are wrong."

Then, to my astonishment, a ferry program was started again in October 1999 on the same route. I wrote at the time that it hadn't worked last time and, since they were not making any real changes to the program, what made them think it would work this time?

As expected, it did not work; the same level of commuters showed up as in 1992 with the usual number of tourists out to get an ocean view of O'ahu on the cheap.

And while the price was low, the cost to us taxpayers was high. The cost is easy to figure out. Follow me: The ferry operated in 1999-2000 for 14 months and carried, at most, 50 commuters each weekday. For this period it cost $2.9 million.

Officials tell me that about 30 percent of the money was spent on planning, promotion and other one-time costs. That leaves us with net spending of $2 million on operations. The 50 commuters divided into the $2 million for 14 months equals expenses of $34,000 per commuter per year. Savor that number for a minute; chartering helicopters would have been cheaper.

But irrespective of the cost, the ferry did not attract commuters out of their cars — for either one of the projects.

Now proponents are once again pushing ferries. Is our collective memory so short that we don't care about the failure in 1992 or the failure in 2000? Don't they know that the evidence of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result?

All sorts of kooky "visions" are put forth for commuter options and that is fine. But after the "vision" must come the drudgery of kicking the tires on comparable systems, checking their financial and operating data, and then producing realistic projections to see if the reality matches the "vision" and then, if it does not, abandoning it. (This is different from the city's past 20-year practice, which has been to use such research solely to shore up whatever our elected "visionaries" have already decided on.)

There is nothing — absolutely nothing — that so demonstrates how little thought really goes into transportation projects than these various ferry episodes. For that matter, nothing demonstrates how little taxpayers seem to care about their money being wasted. And if taxpayers do not care about how their tax money is spent, why should elected officials?

Cliff Slater is a regular columnist whose footnoted columns are at www.lava.net/cslater.