honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Posted on: Wednesday, March 2, 2005

ISLAND VOICES
Find the middle ground for the Superferry

By Kallie Keith

Letter writer Mary Akiona is right: Hawaii Superferry poses serious logistical and infrastructural problems for Maui. Others supporting Superferry are also right. If done right, it could bring families together, help farmers market their goods and improve the economy.

There are good reasons both to scuttle the Superferry and to go ahead.

I want a ferry between islands (not just an O'ahu hub). I want families to see each other often, better markets for farmers, more options for interisland travel — but not at any price. A poorly planned Superferry may not survive. How will that help our economy, families and farmers? The plan should account for challenges before we invest valuable state resources, not after. That's smart, efficient and effective governance.

There are real negative impacts posed by the Superferry, and we need facts about those impacts. For example, no one knows for certain what the cost of a ferry ticket or car transport will be, or what the actual ferry infrastructure plans are because this information is "proprietary." An environmental impact statement would discuss these, other unresolved issues and present solutions. Here are a few issues being discussed on Maui:

SUPERFERRY BILL

• What it does: Senate Bill 1785 requires Hawai'i Superferry to prepare an environmental impact statement for its superferry project.

• What's next: A public hearing on the bill is scheduled at the Capitol today at 1:15 p.m. in conference room 224.

• How to get involved: To have your views heard, contact Sen. Lorraine Inouye, chairwoman of the Senate Transportation and Government Operations Committee, at 586-7335 or your legislative representative. For a complete listing of lawmakers and their districts or for more information on this bill, go to www.capitol.hawaii.gov.

• The law: State laws (HRS 343 and HAR 11-200-12) require an EIS for the Superferry based on at least four criteria. The use of: (1) federal funds, (2) state funds, 3) state land and 4) shoreline areas, all of which are designated conservation lands. The Superferry plan has been in preparation for two years, and an EIS, helpful to all concerned, could easily have been done to meet the funding deadlines. Why do Hawaii Superferry, the Department of Transportation and the Governor's Office claim an EIS is unnecessary?

• Harbor infrastructure: One ferry carrying nearly a thousand people and 200 cars has a small impact on Honolulu Harbor and Honolulu County with over 900,000 residents. Kahului Harbor and Maui County with 140,000 residents are tiny by comparison. Kahului Harbor was built to accommodate freight, not passengers. Cruise ship passengers disembark on the same pier that accommodates Matson container ships, coal ships and long barges carrying sand, rock, etc. That pier holds only two long vessels at a time. By 2006, a cruise ship will be in the harbor six days each week. How will increasing shipments of cargo be loaded and unloaded without delays? How will those delays increase costs on Maui and other islands? How will the Superferry impact this?

• Traffic near Kahului Harbor: For O'ahu residents who aren't familiar with Kahului Harbor and traffic nearby, imagine a daily ferry with almost a thousand passengers and 200 cars in Kewalo Basin without widening the streets in the area. Consider the traffic and congestion along Ala Moana Boulevard. That's how it will feel in Kahului, our most central and heavily used business and commercial district, according to the current Superferry plan.

• Passenger safety: Passengers will disembark from the Superferry in the same area of Kahului Harbor where shipping containers, coal, sand, etc., are unloaded. It's very unsafe for cruise ship passengers now, and a huge potential liability for the shippers, truckers and the state. Compound that with congestion from cars getting on and off the ferry. Is that something you want to arrive to?

• Alien species: The current Superferry plan is an economic and environmental risk for the spread of miconia and clidemia hirta seeds and coqui frog eggs hiding in wheel-well mud from every visiting vehicle. Who will ensure every vehicle is 100 percent clean before it boards a ferry, and who will pay for that? What about state money spent for decades on eliminating and controlling alien species? Will that go to waste? Will Hawaii Superferry put up performance bonds to ensure Neighbor Island farms won't be invaded by pests from other islands or to mitigate economic impacts for these farms?

• Natural and cultural resources protection: People will bring vehicles to Maui specifically to harvest cultural and natural resources, such as fish, opihi, limu, maile, flowers, seeds, awa, etc. What regulations will prevent large numbers of fishing parties arriving from fished-out O'ahu from depleting Maui and Kaua'i of their relatively abundant fish stocks?

• Airlines: Superferry, as it is now planned, will compete with our interisland airlines, both of which are now in bankruptcy, and may put them in worse economic situations. What about economic security for airline employee families and our interisland air traffic system? Will prices rise? Will we lose a carrier or two?

The current Superferry plan has many major impacts — some wonderful, others costly and damaging. I'm not opposed to the Superferry. I'm opposed to pushing the current Superferry plan forward too quickly with too many unanswered questions about potential consequences throughout the state. I'm opposed to this particular flawed and risky plan.

To the governor, DOT and Hawaii Superferry: We need good governance, an EIS and facts about this project before committing large sums of taxpayer funds to support it. Using facts, we can have a Superferry with a secure future. Farmers will fare better, the economy will diversify and families can visit each other often and easily for generations to come. It's a complicated issue. Don't argue this emotionally or oversimplify it. Obey the law. Get the facts. Do an EIS.

Kallie Keith is a Wailuku resident and conservation co-chair of the Maui Group of the Sierra Club.