honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Posted on: Saturday, May 7, 2005

Sweepstakes targeting children

By Caroline E. Mayer
Washington Post

Send your parents packing! Win a free weekend for them at a hotel, compliments of Nickelodeon and the maker of Sweethearts candy and gum.

Or get the ultimate $25,000 basketball court built in your backyard — the big Ritz Bits prize.

Kids like to be winners, and nobody knows that better than the U.S. manufacturers turning to sweepstakes to promote products.

With more companies selling more to children than ever, firms have to find new ways to attract their attention, said Laurie Klein, vice president of Just Kid Inc., a Connecticut marketing firm. That's why firms continue to introduce new flavors, colors and shapes to products such as cereal, ketchup and crackers, and why an estimated $15 billion is spent annually to promote children's products on TV, radio, the Internet, magazines and just about everywhere kids can be found.

Sweepstakes are one more way to "break through the clutter," and distinguish one product from another, Klein said.

Prizes are nothing new, but the Internet has upped the ante from the simple premiums and rewards once offered in boxes of Cracker Jack and cereals to constant, daily promotions.

"We're seeing a real proliferation across the board in sweepstakes" for both kids and adults, said Jill Collins, vice president of marketing and partnerships for Strottman International, a California family-marketing firm. The reason, she said: " 'Free' is still the favorite American word." Critics worry that sweepstakes are an unfair way to promote products to children who are too young to understand that the odds are stacked heavily against them.

Some contests are for small rewards, such as a game to play on a company's Web site.

But many dangle far greater temptations, such as Campbell Soup Co. touting a chance at a one-week trip to a private island for family and friends — complete with a personal chef to prepare "favorite kinds of Campbell's soup and SpaghettiOs."

"If you're a kid, winning stuff is cool," said Cyma Zarghami, president of Nickelodeon Television, the leading children's cable television network, which runs about one to two contests a month. "They make kids feel important and fulfill their fantasy to make their lives exciting." What's more, she said, they help make kids feel more loyal to Nickelodeon, especially when the channel shows a winner being selected.

Some psychologists and marketing critics, however, say the sweepstakes are unfair and deceptive when targeted at children too young to understand that their chances of winning are slim.

Susan E. Linn, a Harvard psychologist and author of "Consuming Kids," thinks sweepstakes aren't good because "kids don't understand the odds, and marketers don't exactly trumpet them."

Most, but not all, ads for kids sweepstakes say "Many will enter, few will win" in small print or at the end of a TV commercial. Some contests give the exact odds in even smaller print, such as the odds of winning the basketball court in the Ritz Bits contest: 1 in 2.2 million.

Yet many online promotions leave the exact odds murky. Campbell's SouperStar Island contest, for example, says the "odds of winning a Grand Prize depend upon the number of eligible entries received."

It is these unclear and often insurmountable odds that make child psychiatrist Alvin Rosenfeld call sweepstakes cruel. Over the years, he said, he has seen children with low self esteem who consider themselves even bigger losers when they don't win the instant prize contained in a candy package. "You can see how crestfallen they are."