Reserve and National Guard members mobilized for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are discovering an inequity in their GI Bill education benefits that needs to be fixed, says Rep. Vic Snyder of Arkansas, senior Democrat on the House Armed Services subcommittee on military personnel.

"It's unconscionable how these young men and women are being treated now that they have served their nation in time of war (and) completed their enlistment contract," Snyder said.

Snyder had served in the Marine Corps just over 21 months, including 13 months in Vietnam. In return, he received 45 months of GI Bill benefits, enough to complete two years of college and three years of evening classes.

Today, active duty members who buy into the Montgomery GI Bill also do pretty well with post-service education benefits.

But consider the experience of Reserve and Guard members, said Snyder. An initial commitment of up to six years can include up to two years of involuntary active duty, with a year or more in a combat zone. Yet reservists who leave service after completing their obligations forfeit any unused Reserve GI Bill benefits.

Because Reserve GI Bill was designed mostly as a retention tool, only members who stay in drill status, subject to call up, can use education benefits. In wartime, Snyder said, this is "terribly unfair."

Twenty years ago, when Congress established Reserve GI Bill, it was "fairly rare for people to be activated," Snyder said in a phone interview. "And even if they were, it was not going to be for a long period of time. That obviously is dramatically different now."

Wartime mobilization not only deepens the sacrifice of reservists but limits their window of time for using Reserve education benefits.

"They are put in situations where they are not going to be able to go to school," Snyder said. "You say, 'You can only use this benefit while in the reserves. Oh, by the way, for the next 18 months we're going to put you in places where you ain't going to go to school.' "

Snyder pounded the issue during a subcommittee hearing this month. Witnesses included David S.C. Chu, the Defense Department's top manpower official, and the service personnel chiefs. Chu promised Snyder that the 10th Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation, a year-long study of military pay and benefits, will review the need for modifying Reserve GI Bill benefits. Chu mentioned the Reserve Education Assistance Program, approved in 2004. Under REAP, members mobilized for 90 days or more since Sept. 11, 2001, get extra education benefits. Rather than payments set at 29 percent of active duty GI Bill, REAP benefits equal 40, 60 or 80 percent of active duty GI Bill, depending on length of activation. But like Reserve GI Bill, unused REAP benefits stop when a member leaves service.

So, said Snyder, a reservist today can spend about as long on active duty and in a war zone as Snyder did 30 years ago "and get nothing (from the) GI Bill when they get out of the service."

Snyder spoke in favor of other changes to Reserve GI Bill being pushed by service associations. One would raise the basic Reserve benefit to equal half the value of active duty GI Bill.

Send comments to milupdate@aol.com; Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120 or visit www.militaryupdate.com.