honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Sunday, December 9, 2007

SAVVY TRAVELER
U.S. airlines have to regain fliers' favor

By Irene Croft Jr.

SKYTRAX 2007 POLL

World's Top 10 best overall airlines:

1. Cathay Pacific, Hong Kong

2. Qantas Airways, Australia

3. Emirates, Dubai

4. Singapore Airlines, Singapore

5. British Airways, United Kingdom

6. Malaysia Airlines, Malaysia

7. Thai Airways, Thailand

8. Qatar Airways, Qatar

9. Asiana Airlines, South Korea

10. ANA All Nippon Airways, Japan

spacer spacer

Are American airlines getting an unfair rap from passengers and travel writers? Not according to a yearlong poll, conducted by London-based Skytrax, released last June that received 12 million responses from frequent fliers of 94 countries who were asked to grade the world's airlines.

The study looked at the entire travel process, from booking a ticket to arriving at a destination. Airlines, both foreign and domestic, were evaluated for their performance both on the ground and aloft. Criteria included efficiency, courtesy problem-solving, luggage handling, plane condition, comfort, and food, among others. All classes of service were considered.

No American carrier was among the Top 10. Cathay Pacific was No. 1 and Qantas No. 2. In fact, few U.S. carriers scored very highly at all. The only clear winner — voted the world's best low-cost airline — was JetBlue, whose energetic employees and streamlined operation appeal to budget-minded Americans.

Why can't American carriers make the grade? You might think the poor rating stems from our airlines' unique financial problems, except that business conditions are challenging for carriers all over the world.

Or you might argue that some of the best scorers are national airlines that receive generous financial assistance from their governments. OK, but what about those billion-dollar subsidies our government handed out after 9/11?

It could be a cultural thing: We Americans complain to the heavens about the discomfort, inconvenience and poor service of our airlines yet seemingly are unwilling to pay the price for additional leg room or better food. U.S. airlines are certainly aware of this.

But the failure to compete successfully against foreign airlines, according to journalist James Wysong, could be charged to the complex business environment within the U.S. that hinders our carriers:

  • Hiring constraints. Thanks to federal regulations, U.S. carriers operate under very strict hiring and firing criteria. They are not allowed to discriminate by age, sex, marital status or ethnicity. Many foreign carriers evaluate potential employees on all of these points, plus appearance.

  • Salary costs. Foreign airlines can pay their employees local wages, which are often but a fraction of the U.S. salary standard. Lower salary costs mean more staff and ultimately better service.

  • Age issues. Many foreign carriers hire eager, young, attractive flight attendants as temporary contract workers. At the end of their contract, they are either signed up for another or released.

    In the U.S., flight attendants cannot be terminated at an arbitrary age, unlike pilots, and some are now great-grandmothers. Unfortunately, many male passengers are fixated on the image of those stunning young "coffee, tea or me" stewardesses of yesteryear.

  • Unions. Rigid work rules can mean less efficiency and more expense for the airline. Airline management must deal with cumbersome regulations, such as contractual obligations and worker protections, that affect nearly every employee, from the mechanic to the pilot. And it's virtually impossible to fire in a timely manner a union member who doesn't perform up to speed.

  • Respect. In the United States, airline pilots, flight attendants and ground agents used to earn and receive a great measure of respect from the flying public. Years of turmoil and clashes within the U.S. airline industry have eroded their pedestals. It's hard to maintain high regard for a carrier and its personnel who imprison passengers for eight hours on a runway without offering food or drink or a reasonable alternative.

    The situation is entirely different abroad, where airline positions are highly sought after and employees as a whole take great pride in their jobs, their airline and in pleasing their customers.

    But America's carriers, Wysong says, have at least two factors in their favor:

  • Frequent flier programs. To fly anywhere in the U.S., you have no choice but to fly on an American carrier. When those passengers have the option of flying a foreign carrier or earning more points in their frequent-flier account, they usually choose their domestic airline.

  • Loyalty. There are still quite a few people in America who remain loyal to any U.S. brand, whether it's a car or airline.

    As for the future, let's encourage American carriers to catch up with — and even surpass — their foreign competitors to create a total travel experience that will be enjoyed, rather than endured. I, for one, am willing to pay a fair ticket price commensurate with the quality delivered.

    Irene Croft Jr. of Kailua, Kona, is a travel writer and 40-year veteran globetrotter. Her column is published in this section every other week.