honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Tuesday, December 18, 2007

When did the terrible 2's become a 'disease'?

By John Rosemond

Dr. Dimitri Papolos of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and his wife, Janice, are the recognized authorities on early onset bipolar disorder. They are the authors of "The Bipolar Child" (Broadway, $27.95), which their Web site (www.bipolarchild.com) calls "the acknowledged bible" concerning the disorder. The book is already in its third edition and has sales of more than 200,000. The Papoloses have a devoted following of parents whose children present the symptom picture in question.

The Papoloses believe early onset bipolar disorder is a serious psychiatric illness caused by as-yet-unknown biological abnormalities and routinely recommend a treatment plan that features powerful psychotropic drugs. They claim that the disorder is much more prevalent than previously thought. For example, they assert that 80 percent of children with early onset bipolar disorder are found to meet full criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, which is to say most kids who are diagnosed with ADHD also have, or really have, early onset bipolar disorder.

Especially intriguing is the Papolos' proposed list of "very common" symptoms for early onset bipolar disorder, including separation anxiety, tantrums (especially in response to the word "no"), defiance, hyperactivity, inattentiveness, unpredictable mood swings and distractibility.

Seemingly, the Papoloses would have us believe that behaviors normally associated with toddlerhood are actually manifestations of a disease that should be treated with drugs that have pronounced negative side effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, severe drowsiness, significant weight gain) as soon in the child's life as possible. Are the "terrible 2's" a disease?

Should most toddlers be on drugs? I have to admit to having no small amount of difficulty with the reasoning involved here. One thing is certain: The Papoloses are a boon to both the mental health and pharmaceutical industries. I'm not so certain they are a boon to children.

In their book and in the May 2007 issue of their newsletter, available through their Web site, the Papoloses recommend against using the word "no" with a bipolar child "because it will trigger a meltdown." When they were toddlers, my children often suffered wild seizures at the sound of "no."

Interestingly, however, these seizures were eventually cured with regular doses of that very word in combination with consequences the Papoloses would probably consider draconian. My wife and I were unaware that we should have been giving them drugs.

In the same issue of their newsletter, the Papoloses say that parents of bipolar children should "suffer the physical abuse" of their children. Over the past few years, I've consulted with quite a few parents of children 2 and older who were prone to hitting and kicking their parents when their parents did not give them their way. In nearly every case (I actually know of no exceptions), these kids were cured of their criminal tendencies in short order by parents who did not suffer this abuse, parents who administered not drugs but quite old-fashioned discipline.

An unknown author (sometimes identified as Jordan W. Smoller, University of Pennsylvania) has posted on the Internet a satire titled "The Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood" in which he proposes, with tongue in cheek, that childhood itself is a disorder with congenital onset. "Smoller's" symptoms include knowledge deficits, dwarfism, emotional lability and legume anorexia, to which I would add separation anxiety, tantrums, defiance, hyperactivity, and every other thing associated with the so-called "terrible 2's."

The satire is truly funny, even hilarious. The question becomes: Is it also prophetic?

Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents' questions at www.rosemond.com.

Make a difference. Donate to The Advertiser Christmas Fund.