honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Friday, May 4, 2007

State, HSTA must take care in drug-test plans

StoryChat: Comment on this story

Public school teachers have taken a big step — a fateful one, some would say — by authorizing a new program of random drug testing in the ratification of their union contract.

The real work of putting the program into effect is just beginning, however. Both sides have some important realities to consider before the testing can begin more than a year from now.

The acceptance of the contract was clearly a tough decision for the Hawai'i State Teachers Association rank and file. But it's one that ultimately will restore some public confidence in the safety of the campus environment, confidence that had been shaken by a handful of teacher arrests on drug charges in recent months.

Granted, those scattered episodes should not impugn the reputation of the state's 13,500 public school teachers: These are educators who take up the profession largely out of their concern for the future of our children.

It's the public interest in the welfare of those children that justifies this initiative: The state should commit to ensuring classroom environments are drug-free.

Other public-employee unions, the United Public Workers and the Hawaii Government Employees Association, have advanced further along this path. Their safeguards are worth studying to see how they might apply to HSTA, but it will take detailed negotiations — talks involving broad representation of teachers statewide — to create a final plan that will stick.

Among the issues to be hammered out:

  • What happens when a test comes back positive? Will the teacher be allowed back in the classroom while that result is rechecked, or be placed on leave immediately? Some teachers justifiably are worried that they could be "outed" as a suspected substance abuser while tests are confirmed.

  • How will the privacy of the testing be assured?

  • What substances will be covered in the tests, and who will pay for the tests and any rehabilitation services that may be needed?

    The answers to these questions will shape the program before implementation after June 30, 2008.

    If the program is to be sustained, it needs to be evaluated carefully in the first year to determine its cost-effectiveness and to work out knotty issues sure to surface in the start-up stages.

    Balancing privacy rights and public security requires that everyone with a stake in the issue has a chance to be heard going forward.