honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Letters to the Editor

SUPERFERRY

MANY APPEALS HEARD WHILE CASE PENDING

Some wonder why it took the Hawai'i Supreme Court two years to decide the Superferry case. Public records show there was ongoing activity throughout the appeal, and when deadlines were extended, it was at the request of a party.

The appeal was filed on July 25, 2005, and the case was assigned to the Supreme Court on Feb. 15, 2006. During the 205 days, Sierra Club filed its opening brief; Hawaii Superferry filed its answering brief (after securing a 30-day extension); and Sierra Club filed its reply brief (after securing a 10-day extension).

Once assigned to the Supreme Court, the case was added to the queue of 200-plus appeals awaiting decision. The notice setting the case for oral argument on Aug. 15, 2007, was issued on June 19, 2007. Hawaii Superferry asked the court to reschedule argument to Aug. 28 or after, but oral argument was held on Aug. 23. On the same day, the court issued a unanimous summary decision, followed by a 104-page opinion on Aug. 31.

From the time the case was assigned until the decision on Aug. 23, the Supreme Court decided more than 300 other appeals, focusing first on cases involving children in the state's custody and persons incarcerated, as well as 90 original proceedings, 150 applications to review decisions of the intermediate appellate court, and 1,300 motions.

In short, while the Superferry appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided many cases, including OHA v. State, Kalima v. State, and Kahoohanohano v. State.

Marsha Kitagawa
Public affairs officer, Hawai'i State Judiciary

TOP REASONS HAWAI'I NEEDS THE SUPERFERRY

Reasons why we need the Superferry:

  • Invasive species are tired of having to swim all the way to Kaua'i and Maui.

  • Seasickness — new interisland rave.

  • Whales need a little excitement.

  • When you've got no job, going down to the harbor to protest breaks up your day.

  • Everyone on O'ahu motivated to spread "urban woe."

  • Three words: more river rocks.

  • Global warming, nuclear holocaust, bird flu pandemic. Superferry — doesn't seem so bad does it?

    Mark Middleton
    Kapolei

    O'AHU RESIDENTS CLEARLY DON'T GET IT ON IMPACT

    It is blatantly clear that O'ahu residents have no understanding of the effect the Superferry will have on the Neighbor Islands.

    If they did, they would understand the reasons for the majority of support on the Neighbor Islands for an environmental assessment or, better still, an environmental impact statement.

    The view on O'ahu has been distorted by the hype generated by the Lingle administration and Superferry. If O'ahu residents removed their rose-colored glasses and got to the truth of the Stryker brigade, traffic, failing infrastructure, invasive species, depletion of our limited resources, etc., they would see things differently.

    Unfortunately, Oahuans have been deceived and have fallen victim to one of the biggest con games the Lingle administration has ever produced. We on the Neighbor Islands know all too well how things really work on O'ahu. Your need to support big business at the expense of what Neighbor Islanders demand is disturbing. And your spin on the truth and the facts is laughable to all of us here.

    James Kuloloio
    Ha'iku, Maui

    RECYCLING

    SIERRA CLUB SHOULD SUPPORT CURBSIDE PLAN

    It's nice to have the head of the Sierra Club, Jeff Mikulina, endorsing the city's new curbside recycling plans, but next time can you spare us the unnecessary and unwarranted sniping?

    Mikulina's claim that the city has previously passed up the chance to have a private local recycler pay $400,000 for the "privilege" of providing curbside recycling is false. The proposal was without substance, the company unlicensed to perform and rejection was automatic and highly publicized, not "inexplicably canceled" by Mayor Hannemann, as Jeff would like us to believe.

    Jeremy Harris' aborted pilot project in Mililani and the premature distribution of blue bins was an ill-thought-out-hurry-up attempt at the end of his administration. The existing UPW contract precluded the hiring of a private party for trash (or recyclables) curbside pick-up. That plan was a non-starter legally, and the avoidable false start again cost the taxpayers.

    Now that the mayor has a well-thought-out curbside program ready to launch, he needs and appreciates the support of the community and the Sierra Club.

    We don't need the pontificating from "theoreticians" like Jeff Mikulina, who lack any real knowledge about running city operations and have a history of ignoring the wishes of the public and wise use of their tax money.

    Jeff J. Coelho
    Executive advisor to the mayor

    CRIME

    CAN HAWAI'I STILL CALL ITSELF THE ALOHA STATE?

    My dad is the pastor of a local church that is able to offer a place here for those who are burnt out to come to and enjoy paradise.

    Last week we welcomed a pastor and his family who came to take a very well-deserved vacation. On Thursday, they went to the beach and stopped for dinner at Ala Moana.

    They parked their car only to come back and find it had been broken into and a backpack containing all their important documents, wallet, cash, digital camera, etc. had been stolen.

    This happened in a high-traffic area not known for crime. Yet despite the high visibility, the thief managed to have enough time to pick out only the valuable things.

    It has saddened me to look around and feel that we have lost a lot of our aloha spirit in recent years. Incidents such as this only serve to further that belief.

    What has the state of aloha come to if a family that has burned itself out helping others cannot experience some aloha here because of the greed of a few?

    Can we still call ourselves the aloha state?

    Joyce Lee
    Honolulu

    WAIALUA-KAIAKA BAY

    CORPS OF ENGINEERS WANTS WATERSHED STUDY

    The Advertiser's Sept. 19 story "North Shore residents urge flood prevention," did not completely explain the Army Corps of Engineers' role in the proposed Waialua-Kaiaka Bay Watershed Project.

    At the request of, and in cooperation with, the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, the corps would like to do a comprehensive study of the Waialua-Kaiaka Bay watershed, provided that federal funds become available.

    The proposed reconnaissance study, estimated at $300,000, would be conducted by the corps for DLNR.

    Identification of problems and potential remedial actions would provide the momentum for improvements, further economic development and conservation of ecosystems. The findings would identify both the best road ahead and the roles of the various agencies involved.

    A subsequent feasibility study would look into the problems in more detail and come up with alternative solutions and costs that will help our state partners address solutions to water resource problems (flooding and ecosystem degradation, water conservation and supply).

    We hope that this will lead to a potential Corps of Engineers role in actual construction work down the road in order to safeguard residents of the community and their property.

    Joseph Bonfiglio
    Chief of public affairs, Honolulu Engineer District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

    GABBARD

    DEMOCRATS' WELCOME WAS DISCOURAGING

    One of the most discouraging displays I've seen in years was the lineup to greet Mike Gabbard as he turned Democrat. There was Colleen Hanabusa, Mike McCartney, and a big hug from Dan Akaka.

    I have voted Democrat for 52 years, but never again here in Hawai'i. Not even for Neil or Mazie.

    George Vye
    Honolulu

    TRASH

    O'AHU SHOULD CONSIDER PLASMA ARC TECHNOLOGY

    Before the City Council and mayor move ahead with shipping O'ahu's garbage off to the Mainland or building new landfills, they should check out St. Lucie County in Florida, where officials are finalizing plans for the world's largest plasma arc waste disposal plant.

    It's reported that Geoplasma Inc. will build and operate a $425 million facility that uses a 10,000-degree Fahrenheit arc of electric plasma to flash 3,000 tons of rubbish a day into hot gas and slag, netting enough surplus electrical energy to power 40,000 homes. The obsidian-like slag can be used as building blocks, pavement or insulation.

    Besides using the daily collection and commercial disposal of trash to fuel the plant, operators plan to mine the county's existing landfill of another 1,000 tons a day.

    It seems the perfect solution for O'ahu, which has already had a couple of modest tries at the plasma arc technology dating back to the 1990s. Perhaps the Neighbor Islands could barge their rubbish to O'ahu.

    Higher energy, transportation and land costs as well as growing environmental concerns have driven rapid advancements and interest worldwide in the technology that amounts to a controlled steady bolt of lightning that transforms waste into its basic elements — primarily carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen. This is not the same as the H-power plant that burns the rubbish.

    So, who pays for this? In Florida, Geoplasma picks up the tab, recovering its investment costs with the sale of the excess electricity.

    Bruce Dunford
    'Ewa Beach