honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Wednesday, April 8, 2009

More than $100M in earmarks for Hawaii sought in U.S. House

By John Yaukey
Advertiser Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Hawai'i's U.S. House representatives have assembled a list of special projects to be inserted in the 2010 federal budget — including $58.5 million for Native Hawaiian programs, $30 million for the city's commuter rail project and $28 million for the decades-old think tank East-West Center.

These requests — or earmarks — follow a list of earmarked projects by Hawai'i's lawmakers contained in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill passed in March, which contained $372 million for Hawai'i for the remainder of fiscal year 2009, which ends Sept. 30.

The Senate is expected to disclose its 2010 earmark requests in the coming weeks.

Earmarks make up a tiny percentage of federal spending, but despite efforts to reduce them and make it easier for the public to see who requested what, they remain controversial.

Hawai'i's congressional delegation has been unrepentant in supporting the earmark process and going after them. The state's 2010 earmark list contains scores of funding requests totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.

"The majority of my requests are in line with areas I continue to focus on in my work in Congress — educational, agricultural and infrastructure projects, as well as renewable-energy programs in Hawai'i," said Democratic Rep. Mazie Hirono. "The funding requests will strengthen our state's economy over the long term while addressing the immediate budgetary needs for these programs."

Hawai'i's other House member, Democrat Neil Abercrombie, could not be reached for comment on this story.

SOME TOP REQUESTS

Some of Hawai'i's top earmark requests for the 2010 budget include:

  • $34.3 million for education services for Native Hawaiians.

  • $14.2 million for Native Hawaiian healthcare.

  • $10 million for affordable-housing programs for Native Hawaiians eligible to live on Hawaiian Homelands.

  • $15 million to help farmers in Hawai'i, Alaska and the Pacific basin.

  • $13.6 million for waterfront work at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard.

  • $8 million to expand Hawaii Volcanoes National Park.

    Both of Hawai'i's House members posted their earmark requests on their Web sites in accordance with a new requirement to make the funding process more transparent. They also have to state who would get the money and why it's a good use of taxpayer dollars.

    In the past, most lawmakers have disclosed only those requests that were approved for funding.

    Some earmarks requested for Hawai'i are the sort that opponents of the process have mocked as frivolous — $4.8 million for a bike path on Kaua'i, $3 million to pay for an environmental impact statement on a fruit fly rearing and sterilization facility, and $233,000 for papaya research.

    "With some lawmakers there's just an insatiable appetite for these projects," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Washington-based Taxpayers for Common Sense. "They're perfectly happy to get their piece of the pie and call it a day."

    INOUYE'S LONG COATTAILS

    There's no guarantee Hawai'i will get all the earmarks its lawmakers request. But the power of Democratic Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, ensures that most of the requests will be well-protected through the budget process, which typically does not end until the summer.

    "Hawai'i's House members have some long coattails they can ride over on the Senate side," Ellis said.

    Inouye is expected to duplicate much of the House request list when senators post all their earmarks.

    Earmarks have played a role in lobbying and campaign finance scandals. They've also been criticized because project funding is distributed less on comparative merit than on clout, including a lawmaker's committee assignment or leadership post and whether the lawmaker's party is in the majority or he or she faces a competitive re-election.

    Inouye contends earmarks are fine as long as lawmakers are open about what they're requesting.

    "The problem is not earmarks," he said in a statement. "The problem is the secrecy, which led to abuses in the past."

    Inouye contends many earmarked projects have proven invaluable.

    He cites the East-West Center as an example, even though earmark opponents say it shouldn't be funded through the federal budget.

    "The center ... is recognized nationally and internationally for its ability to strengthen relations and understanding among the peoples and nations of Asia, the Pacific and the United States," he said. "There are numerous other examples of programs, facilities and infrastructure that have been created or funded through earmarks that have greatly benefited the American people."

    Maureen Groppe of the Gannett Washington Bureau contributed to this report. Contact John Yaukey at jyaukey@gannett.com.

    • • •