honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Sunday, May 3, 2009

Anti-prostitution law ruled invalid

By Jim Dooley
Advertiser Staff Writer

A state law used by police to arrest customers of prostitutes in Waikiki and other specified areas of Honolulu is defective and can't be enforced, the state Intermediate Court of Appeals has ruled.

Law enforcement officials pointed out that another section of the penal code can still be used by police to target both prostitutes and their customers anywhere in Hawai'i, but that statute carries a slightly lower penalty than the now-banned law.

The appeals court last week ruled in favor of Rollie Dumasig Espinosa, who was convicted last year of soliciting a prostitute in the Downtown area of Kukui and A'ala Streets, designated by the city as a "significant prostitution-activity" zone.

Waikiki also is designated as such a zone.

Under a law passed by the Legislature in 1998, anyone convicted of soliciting prostitution — including the customer — in such a zone must serve a mandatory 30-day jail term.

Conviction under the standard prostitution law carries a penalty of up to 30 days in jail.

In a decision written by Appellate Judge Corinne Watanabe, the court struck down the prostitution zone law when it is used against customers of prostitutes, commonly known as johns.

Because the law uses the phrase "in return for a fee," the decision said, the law can only be used against a prostitute.

"It is only the recipient of the fee, and not the payor of the fee, who can commit the offense," the ruling said.

The more frequently used law banning prostitution used to contain the same phrase but it was removed by the Legislature in 1990.

Because the street solicitation statute used against Espinosa still contains the phrase, "We conclude that ... the Legislature intended to exclude a patron of a prostitute, such as Espinosa, from criminal liability," the court found.

Jim Fulton, executive assistant to Prosecutor Peter Carlisle, said that office will ask the Legislature next year to amend the statute.

The Public Defender's Office, which won the Espinosa appeal, said it does not keep statistics on how many cases have been brought against customers under the street solicitation statute.

Deputy public defender Ronette Kawakami said her colleagues can only recall "a few cases" where customers have been prosecuted under the law.

"The vast majority of cases involve prostitutes, not customers," she said.

Reach Jim Dooley at jdooley@honoluluadvertiser.com.