honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Updated at 2:19 p.m., Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Army won't seek second court-martial against Watada

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

Hawaii news photo - The Honolulu Advertiser

June 7, 2006 file photo of 1st Lt. Ehren Watada

AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File

spacer spacer

The Army today said it has given up efforts to retry 1st Lt. Ehren Watada on three charges for refusing to deploy to Iraq in 2006, but has not made up its mind about two other court-martial charges or the possibility of administrative punishment.

More than a year and a half after he would have left the Army — had he deployed as ordered — the 1996 Kalani High School graduate still reports to a desk job at Fort Lewis in Washington State.

Watada is likely to continue to have to do so as the Army weighs its next move.

Fort Lewis spokesman Joe Piek today said the Army was informed late last week that the U.S. Justice Department — which represents the Army in the case — had decided against continuing with an appeal of an October 2008 federal court ruling.

U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle of Tacoma ruled at that time that the Army could not retry Watada on a charge of missing his Stryker brigade unit's movement to Iraq, and two specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer for taking part in a press conference and participating in a Veterans for Peace convention.

Watada raised double jeopardy, the constitutional protection against being tried twice for the same crime, after a military judge declared a mistrial at Watada's first court-martial in February of 2007.

Two other charges of conduct unbecoming an officer were withdrawn, but not dismissed, as a result of Watada's court-martial.

Watada, the first commissioned officer to publicly refuse deployment to Iraq, said the war was illegal and unjust, and that participating in it would make him a party to war crimes.

The Honolulu man also accused the Bush administration of deception in starting the war. The Army appealed Settle's October ruling, but has now dropped that appeal.

Asked why the appeal was dropped, Piek said, "That would be a question you would have to ask (the Justice Department). I don't know."

"Right now, the other two specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer are still relevant in the case," Piek said. He added that the leadership at Fort Lewis "is considering a full range of judicial and administrative options that are available, and those range from court-martial on those two remaining specifications, to non-judicial punishment, to administrative separation from the Army."

At one time, Watada faced up to six years in prison for refusing to board a plane for Mosul, Iraq. Jim Lobsenz, an attorney for Watada, in October said his client at most faced one to two years on the remaining two charges. But the attorney said he was confident the remaining two charges, if pursued, would be thrown out as well.

Ken Kagan, another attorney representing Watada, today said the Army could have drawn out its appeal on the three charges against Watada into late 2010 or early 2011.

"So having this one cleared away and no longer an issue is a significant victory in the sense that now we can focus on really getting this thing resolved," Kagan said.

Kagan said discussions continue with the Army "to see if we can find some common ground" on the remaining issues.

Reach William Cole at wcole@honoluluadvertiser.com.