Owning homes on borrowed time getting some in trouble
By David Streitfeld
Los Angeles Times
Every day, Will Hertzberg owns a little less of his three-bedroom house in Corona, Calif.
Like hundreds of thousands of other homeowners statewide, Hertzberg has a mortgage that lets him choose how much he pays each month.
Like many of them, he always chooses to pay as little as possible.
For the moment, this allows the 56-year-old Hertzberg to continue living in his tract home despite being only marginally employed. But his debt is swelling, and his mortgage company controls his fate.
"I am rather screwed," he said.
Alarmed regulators recently have attempted to force lenders to cut back on loans such as Hertzberg's. Even some industry executives are beginning to wonder how these borrowers will handle their added debt, especially if housing prices stay flat or fall.
If it turns out that many can't, it would be a major blow to the housing market. In the worst outcome, it could drag down the overall economy.
Hertzberg could sell now, but his lender would charge him an $11,034 prepayment penalty — money he doesn't have. Yet if he stays, the housing market may tank, vaporizing what little equity he has left.
"I made choices, and they happened to be the wrong choices," Hertzberg said.
The real-estate boom of the past few years has made it very easy to become overextended.
Earlier generations bought houses knowing they had no choice but to keep paying at the same rate for three decades. Their reward: the ability to sleep well, knowing their payments wouldn't abruptly adjust upward.
As interest rates rose in the early 1980s, many borrowers couldn't afford these traditional loans. Lenders responded with adjustable mortgages that offered lower introductory rates.
A few years ago, as home prices began escalating sharply, lenders pushed loans that let the homeowner pay only the interest for an initial period.
When even that was too onerous for some borrowers, they offered loans such as Hertzberg's, often called "pay option" loans.
One of his options is to pay $2,513 a month. That would cover the principal and interest as if it were a traditional 30-year loan.
A second possibility is to pay $2,279, which would cover only the interest.
But each month he always takes the cheapest option: paying $1,106 and promising to make up the shortfall later.
Last fall, he went to a mortgage broker and refinanced again to make his payments easier to bear. He thought he would have a five-year window before the principal started coming due.
But the day of reckoning is arriving early. By paying the minimum, Hertzberg has increased the size of his loan in a little over a year from $320,000 to $332,616. His lender, Countrywide Financial Corp., sent him a letter warning that when his loan hits 115 percent of its original size, he'll run out of credit with the company.
Essentially, option loans are bets that good things will happen. Maybe the mortgage holder will get a big raise, or sell a script to Hollywood, or inherit a chunk of change. When the borrower has to start paying off the loan in earnest in five years, the plan is that he or she will somehow be able to handle it.
At a minimum, the borrower is betting the housing market will be better in a few years than it is today. If the house goes up in value, it will be possible to refinance and the day of reckoning can be put off once again.
In 2003, only about eight of every 1,000 people buying a home or refinancing a mortgage in California obtained a pay option loan, according to San Francisco-based data tracking company First American LoanPerformance.
Last year, one in five loan applicants received one.
After four years of escalating prices, they're the only way some first-time buyers can get into the market. But another group flocking to option loans are homeowners who find themselves stretched. For those beset by calamity, these are the loans of last resort.
Countrywide sees little risk of widespread foreclosures, saying its pay option customers have good credit scores, indicating a high degree of financial stability. But at a company investment conference in September, Chairman Angelo R. Mozilo seemed to indicate that these borrowers might be naively optimistic.
"The average age of our borrowers is about 38 years old," Mozilo said. "They have never in their adult lives seen values going down. The concept is alien to them."