honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Friday, February 24, 2006

COMMENTARY
The case for getting rid of Hawai'i gas cap

By Rep. Kirk Caldwell

Over the past six months, Hawai'i consumers have experienced the extreme volatility of the experimental gas cap law. After much debate, the House recently took the bold step of moving legislation that would do away with this failed experiment. We should repeal the gas cap because it is the wrong approach to regulating the petroleum industry.

Gas cap law proponents, such as state Sen. Ron Menor, claim the law works because it results in immediate reductions in Hawai'i gas prices when the benchmark spot market prices go down. They say it prevents Hawai'i's "non-competitive" oil companies from skimming excess profits as prices gradually decrease. Even if we assume that the gas cap law has achieved a certain amount of success, as the proponents claim, it imposes wider and enduring costs that outweigh its single purported benefit.

There are several problems with the gas cap:

  • Geography. Both before and after the implementation of the cap, Hawai'i's prices remained the highest in the nation. We need to concede that our geography and small size may be the single largest driver of this fact and there may be no fair way to get around this.

  • Hawai'i is unique: Why use outside benchmarks? Right now, the gas cap bases our prices on three arbitrary spot market benchmarks: Los Angeles, New York and the Gulf Coast. We are now susceptible to events that are totally outside of our control. Hurricane Katrina was only one example of an event that did impact us. What about a powerful earthquake in Southern California or a particularly cold winter in New York? After all, these are not totally impossible scenarios. Sen. Menor is now proposing to change the benchmarks. But, no location in the world is without vulnerabilities and no benchmark will address the unknown.

  • The gas cap is not helping the consumer. The caps appear to have created significantly wider gross profit margins. Whether this is a long-term trend is yet to be seen. As was reported in the press recently, Tesoro is making massive profits. If the gas caps were truly functioning as intended, how could that be the case?

  • The gas cap stifles competition and hurts local players. It's already difficult to establish new businesses in Hawai'i's petroleum market. The gas cap only exacerbates this problem. The law predetermines prices and thereby suppresses competition. For refiners, distributors and retailers, there's no incentive to compete. Additionally, the wide gas cost variation each week has created irregular inventory ordering, impacting distributors and retail dealers.

  • The gas cap disrupts local families' lives. The consumption, commuting and purchasing patterns of Hawai'i citizens are drastically affected. We plan our travel and time our purchases based on announced price changes. These "social costs" are disrupting people's lives.

    I believe that many of my colleagues in the Legislature have presented viable alternatives. The House took the first step of doing away with the gas cap. But repealing the gas cap is not enough.

    We need to create standard ways of accessing petroleum industry information and then use this information to ensure there is fair competition. Reps. Marcus Oshiro and Hermina Morita introduced legislation to fund a petroleum monitoring, analysis and reporting system.

    This important information then needs to be applied to ensure fair petroleum market business practices for the state. Greater success is possible if we beef up our enforcement provisions to combat anti-competitive practices. Two bills introduced by Rep. Oshiro and me would substantially strengthen our existing antitrust laws within the petroleum industry.

    We also need to lower the barriers to competition. It is commonly known that the Neighbor Islands are burdened with higher gas prices than is O'ahu. Rep. Jon Karamatsu and I have introduced separate legislation to build adequate storage facilities on the Neighbor Islands that would enable the Neighbor Islands to buy gas at lower prices.

    And we need to free ourselves from our dependence on fossil fuels. As demand for fuel in developing parts of the world grows while the finite supply of oil declines, prices will continue to escalate. Unless we are willing to pay exorbitantly high gas prices, alternatives need to be developed. As much as we would like to bury our heads in the sand, our job is to find those alternatives. If we fail, our state economy will be controlled not by businesses and people here in Hawai'i, but by oil suppliers in other countries.

    Beyond the gas cap, our energy policy should focus on developing Hawai'i's vast and mostly untapped alternative energy resources. These include solar energy, wind energy, wave energy, ocean thermal energy, geothermal energy and biomass. No other state in our nation is blessed with so many alternative-energy resources.

    The House is taking the wide-angle view of addressing the problems of Hawai'i's petroleum industry in a more constructive and meaningful manner. The petroleum market is incredibly complex and there is no simple solution, but steps can be taken so that we better understand how the price of gas is set and ensure that fair competition and reduced demand play a role in keeping prices down.

    Rep. Kirk Caldwell is a Democrat representing the Manoa area. He wrote this commentary for The Advertiser.