honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Sunday, August 26, 2007

City must set priorities for spending new housing fund

StoryChat: Comment on this story

The shortage of affordable homes is a crisis being held in check by an increasingly leaky dam. Which, with money just set aside, is a crucial question that Honolulu leaders have not yet tackled.

That's a fair description of the challenge now before the city government with the accumulation of its first $4 million or so in a new affordable housing fund.

Because of the charter amendment voters passed in the last election, 1 percent of property tax revenues is being evenly divided between two new funds: one for affordable-housing programs and one for land conservation initiatives.

Addressing only the first issue for the present, it's clear that Honolulu, which has no housing agency, needs a sensible housing policy nonetheless.

The housing agency was dissolved about a decade ago, and scandals surrounding the controversial 'Ewa Villages project hastened its demise. There was also the rationale that the city wanted to get out of the business of building and managing affordable homes, and nobody disputes the wisdom of that.

Unfortunately, with the closure of the housing agency, staff with skills in critical demand also dispersed. That has made the efficient use of housing funds for existing projects much more difficult.

This vacuum should be filled. Leadership is needed to devise strategies for using the new fund as well as the existing resources available for housing. Money has been budgeted to hire a housing liaison, and hiring an experienced industry leader to take the reins of this planning process, with adequate staff support, would be a logical first step.

This team, while small, should be equipped to provide the leadership needed to make the best use of federal block grant money — about $9 million every year — as well as tap the city's bonding authority to help finance its initiatives.

Once that structure is in place, a strategic plan is needed for using the new fund. Here are some suggestions:

  • A number of city-owned affordable housing projects are due to be put up for sale. The administration already has hopes to convey them to nonprofit or for-profit agencies that would be able to keep affordable units in the inventory far more cheaply than building new ones. The new fund could serve as gap financing to enable the agencies to acquire the properties.

  • The city should examine ways it can support developers in adding to the stock of low-income rentals and transitional housing. Inroads already made toward homeless solutions are noteworthy, but the work is far from over.

  • Several housing advocates have noted a shrinking supply of affordable rentals for "gap group" residents. Many of these include young professionals who aren't in a position to buy, don't qualify for renter's assistance and aren't able to find adequate housing.

    These people are leaving Hawai'i in increasing numbers to build a life elsewhere. This state can ill afford to sit back and watch the depletion of its middle class. Incentives for the development of gap-group rentals would be a wise investment.

  • Further down the road, city housing funds might be used to leverage other resources in the development of affordable units for purchase as well. Programs elsewhere, such as New Homes for Chicago, could provide a lesson for the Islands in creative development. In Chicago, financial incentives are used to reduce costs of building homes for purchase by moderate-income working people.

    Home ownership is still the American dream, and the city should play its part in keeping that dream alive here for the middle-income group.

    Certainly, only the barest beginning can be made with the initial funds — $4 million won't go very far. But our city administration and lawmakers have to get the right people and the right plan in place before taking that first step.