Lana'i runway: some answers first, please

The state’s proposal for a longer runway at the Lana‘i Airport may be a good deal for all concerned, but it should not proceed without some clarity about its long-range effects.

The extension, which presumably would allow jets from the Mainland and elsewhere to fly there nonstop, would cost the state nothing, with David Murdock’s Castle & Cooke picking up the state’s share and federal money covering the lion’s share. Yet state tax revenues would be enhanced by increased visitor traffic to Lana‘i.

How much of an increase? The promise of Boeing 737, 757 and 767 service suggests another wave of development on Lana‘i.

That possibility raises some controversial issues that must be addressed: How does the long-time population feel about new development, and what can be done to preserve their desired lifestyle? How many outsiders would be imported to build and operate new resort properties? Would they also be high-end luxury resorts? Who is responsible for needed new infrastructure: school, hospital, roads and — most critical — the sufficient availability of potable water?

Given approval of federal spending, the extension could begin in three years — if the right answers are forthcoming.

[back to top]