Monday, January 29, 2001
home page local news opinion business island life sports
AP National & International News
Traffic Hotspots
School Calendar
E-The People
Email Lawmakers
Classified Ads
Restaurant Guide
Business Directory

Posted on: Monday, January 29, 2001

Hawai'i delegation against Bush plans

By Susan Roth
Advertiser Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Hawaii’s congressional delegation strongly opposed President Bush’s first initiatives last week, offering traditional Democratic arguments against his proposals for school vouchers, nationwide student testing, and across-the-board tax cuts.

Tuesday, Bush acted on his campaign promise to make education reform his top priority. He proposed providing more money to improve public schools and teacher education, requiring more testing and ultimately allowing students to use federal money to attend private schools if their schools fail to meet new national standards.

The new administration has yet to officially release Bush’s proposal to cut taxes by about $1.6 trillion, but two senators introduced the legislation last Monday. The plan would lower current tax rates, which now range from 15 percent to 39.6 percent, to 10 percent to 33 percent. It would also double the child tax credit to $1,000, reduce the so-called "marriage penalty" paid by some couples who file jointly and eliminate estate taxes.

"The way the voucher system has been arranged by the Bush administration, it will eventually set aside public schools only for very poor or wipe them out," said Sen. Dan Inouye (D-Hawaii). "We need a good public education system that’s available to all."

Student testings expensive

Inouye also said he doesn’t believe Bush realizes the expense of nationwide student testing. Tests must be customized to local populations in order to be meaningful, especially for a multiethnic group such as Hawaii’s students, Ino-uye said.

States are already testing students regularly, he added. "We can set up certain federal standards, but the president should encourage the states to do it instead of saying the federal government will do the testing."

Sen. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), a former educator, said he is pleased the president is focusing on education and recognizes the need to increase federal support. But he, too, worries about how testing would take diversity into account and how to avoid having the test become the curriculum, said his spokesman, Paul Cardus.

Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-urban Honolulu), another former teacher and staunch supporter of unions, had harsh criticism for Bush’s education proposals. He said what Bush really means with his voucher and teacher education proposals is: "Let’s go beat up on teachers, particularly if they’re organized, if their students are having difficulties."

"He’s saying, Let’s punish schools that don’t produce,’ when he should be increasing teacher pay, reducing class size and giving teachers the proper equipment and infrastructure," Abercrombie said. "Instead, he’s telling them to make do with what you have, we’ll test the daylights out of you and if you don’t make it, we’ll close you down."

Rep. Patsy Mink (D-rural Oahu, Neighbor Islands) and a member of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, has said she also strongly opposes the voucher and testing proposals.

Compromising might jeopardize Social Security

On the tax plan, Hawaii’s lawmakers say Bush won’t be able to carry out his proposal and also invest in education and other programs such as prescription drug coverage for seniors.

"There are certain tax cuts where he’ll find bipartisan support," such as eliminating the marriage penalty and the estate tax, said Inouye. The total could be a third or even half of what the president is suggesting, Inouye said. "But if you want to also accommodate additional education spending, defense spending and debt pay-back, you get nothing and Social Security would not be saved."

In addition, Inouye said he would like to see more benefits for the poor. "For them, $100 means food in the mouth. On the other end of the spectrum, $10,000 is a question of whether they get something they can do without. I’m not too supportive of providing more luxuries."

Akaka also said he would support tax cuts only if other priorities are taken care of first, including debt reduction, and only if the economy stays buoyant.

Abercrombie said under Bush’s plan, "the richest 1 percent of the population are getting 100 times the tax cut of everybody else. We have to address the inequities of the tax system, not provide more money to those who already have it."

Abercrombie, who last year was one of the most vocal Demo-cratic supporters of Republican efforts to eliminate the estate tax, said he believed that part of the package is likely to succeed. He said he would prefer a rate reduction rather than an outright repeal, but he is willing to work with the Republicans again this year on the issue.

Mink did not respond to requests for comment on the tax proposal.

[back to top]

Home | Local News | Opinion | Business | Island Life | Sports
Weather | Traffic Hotspots | Obituaries | School Calendar | Email Lawmakers
How to Subscribe | How to Advertise | Site Map | Terms of Service | Corrections

© COPYRIGHT 2001 The Honolulu Advertiser, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.